- Employment and Support Allowance (ESA) sanctions, including: whether the current ESA sanctions regime is appropriate and proportionate for jobseekers with ill health and disabilities; and the reasons for recent sharp increases in the number of ESA sanctions
- Whether particular groups of ESA and JSA claimants (by impairment type; age; gender etc.) are proportionately more likely to be sanctioned than others
- To follow up the Committee's recommendation for a full independent review, to investigate the purpose, effects and efficacy of benefit sanctions, and to consider the issues such a review would need to take into account, including:
- What are the current sanctions regimes trying to achieve and what evidence is there that they work?
- To what extent are sanctions justified solely as a means of ensuring that unemployed benefit claimants fulfil the conditions of benefit entitlement?
- What evidence is there that benefit sanctions also encourage claimants to engage more actively in job-seeking and ultimately move into employment? How could this be measured?
- What are the wider implications of sanctions in terms of their impacts on claimants?
- What are the alternatives to the current sanctions regimes? For example:
- How might the current system of financial sanctions be altered to make it more appropriate or effective?
- Is there a case for non-financial sanctions?
- What form could non-financial sanctions take?
- Are there examples of good practice from other countries?
by 5pm on Wednesday 26th November. We'll then compile a joint response and get it sent off.
No comments:
Post a Comment